And why have you trained that teacher to be somebody who cannot explain a simple thing like the variants of a text? Nisha marked it as to-read Mar 29, Those who do not agree with his interpretation are free to enter into a dialogue and put forward their interpretation. Do you think there needs to be any kind of leeway given because of that? Indeed Ramanujan’s right to write the essay on Ramayana should be inviolable.
Subscribe to South Asia Citizens Wire feeds from sacw. Subversions and inversions, contestations and rebuttals abound—was Ravana indeed the evil demonic figure of the brahmanical imagination; did the rakshasas actually gorge on flesh and blood; was it the lust of Ravana that led to his ruin? Manu marked it as to-read Nov 14, Husain’s paintings of Hindu goddesses. Do you think that this can be dismissed as an isolated instance, an aberration, or does it have serious implications?
At first she uses the usual arguments: Ramanujan specifically prefers the term “tellings” to the usual terms ramanujnas and “variants” because the latter terms can and essya imply the existence of an invariant original text.
A hurt Hindu, his sentiments backed up by the sort of antagonism to ideas in which only cretinous Indian vice-chancellors specialize, takes the publisher to court. He publishes the essay, alongside many others which argue the same view — oddly, these other essays are not deemed offensive merely because Delhi University happens not to prescribe them — with the University of California Press, from which the Oxford University Press in India buys rights of republication for South Asia.
Lists with This Book. Legally, a publisher in India who has offended a fellow Indian by republishing the views of Darwin and Einstein can find himself being asked to appear in a mofussil court in Kargil or Kanyakumari.
Three Hundred Ramayanas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation – Wikipedia
Several disciplinary areas are enriched with A. There’s a political element that a says this is what my party doesn’t object to, and would quite like my supporting it, or b that this is really not my concern, it’s a political issue, let the Academic Council take a decision, which is why I gather there were quite a few abstentions as well, or c don’t take a positive role in this because tomorrow, you may be in the dock and no one will support you.
Rubal added it Nov 12, See some reactions in the Indian media below to Oxford University Press’ response. Three of the members were of the opinion that the essay hunxred germane to the course and that there was nothing wrong with it.
Three Hundred Ramayanas – Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation by A.K. Ramanujan
Manu marked it as to-read Nov 14, The interesting thing about this whole argument about interdisciplinarity is that the social sciences are always attacked. No, there hasn’t been and for this I blame particularly the visual media, because they have fostered the notion of there being definitive versions of every single major text in our cultural heritage and they have totally underplayed the fact that there have been variants.
The essay was a required reading on Delhi University’s syllabus for history undergraduates from onward. Well, that’s precisely my point. Rahul Kopparthi added it Jun 10, At ThriftBooks, our motto is: Prasanth P Nair marked it as to-read Oct 13, So what do you do?
Was it an issue for the Academic Council at all or should it have been left to the History Department alone? Reciprocity and Transformation in Hindu and Jain Texts, pp.
Three Hundred Ramayanas – Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation
And then it becomes sacred literature. Gunabhadra borrows this motif in the 9th century CE, and the girl child is placed in a casket and buried in Mithila by Marica, the demon that could change his form at will. I think there’s a political background to it because the initial attack against this essay [in ] was led by the ABVP which made sure that TV cameras had begun to roll when they carried out the attack, so that it would be properly recorded.
To anybody trying to deal with historical texts it is a remarkably insightful example. In the second tradition, in addition to countering, the narrative seeks to provide some alternate views as well.
But this end brings home to Hanuman, the ever faithful bhakta of Rama, that there is no one Rama, there are many Ramas, and no single Ramayana hundrde many Ramayanas.
Half of them haven’t even heard of the Kamba Ramayana. VasuHarsh rated it really liked it Mar 24, The case for mounting a defence of Dembowski and Laine earlier, and Ramanujan now, is not just very strong, it is absolutely required.
Ramayana: An ‘epic’ controversy
This is a really very creative essay. It’s been pointed out that Ramanujan himself is not a historian, but poet and folklorist. Saiteja marked it as to-read Jun 12, He promises in court that he will renounce Ramanujan and not reprint the offensive essay.